From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Pavel Machek" <pavel@ucw.cz>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected)
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 20:47:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804132047.10221.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86802c440804131107s7c132bc6j10ba713e50589353@mail.gmail.com>
On Sunday, 13 of April 2008, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday, 13 of April 2008, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Friday, 11 of April 2008, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > > > > > On Friday, 11 of April 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thursday, 10 of April 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > First, the X server doesn't want to start (it says it couldn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > mmap the framebuffer).
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > could you send your .config?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Attached.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > could you disable this option:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > CONFIG_NONPROMISC_DEVMEM=y
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > does it help with the X problem?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That didn't help.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > btw., Xorg works fine here on a comparable AMD system - but i use a
> > > > > > > > rather new distro (Fedora 8) which has Xorg 7.2.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My system is an OpenSUSE 10.3 and it has Xorg 7.2 as well.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think the problem is somehow related to the Radeon.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The bisection turned up commit ea1441bdf53692c3dc1fd2658addcf1205629661
> > > > > > "x86: use bus conf in NB conf fun1 to get bus range on, on 64-bit" as the one
> > > > > > causing problems.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Unfortunately, I can't revert cleanly it, because there are two more commits
> > > > > > depending on it in a highly nontrivial fashion, so I have reverted all three
> > > > > > commits
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a365998cd2cecfb827469dbd57c29602c106cb83
> > > > > > 44f7f90fbe7a3a99aab082f765346514b7b5c705
> > > > > > ea1441bdf53692c3dc1fd2658addcf1205629661
> > > > > >
> > > > > > and X starts again. Also, suspend to RAM works from under X.
> > > > >
> > > > > please keep the three patches and applied the two attached debug patches.
> > > > >
> > > > > i wonder if there is some io allocation overlapping with your system.
> > > >
> > > > Attached is a boot dmesg output from the current x86 git tree with your two
> > > > patches applied.
> > > >
> > > can you try to apply the patch i sent to you about agp bridge order
> > > reading for buggy silicon?
> > >
> > > Please boot kernel with "debug"...
> > >
> > > I want to verify if you can get
> > >
> > > "
> > > Aperture conflicts with PCI mapping.
> > > "
> > >
> > > in your boot log...
> >
> > It's not present in there:
> >
> > rafael@albercik:~> grep Aperture failing-with-patch-dmesg.log
> > Aperture too small (32 MB)
> > Aperture from AGP @ de000000 size 4096 MB (APSIZE 0)
> > Aperture too small (0 MB)
> > agpgart: Aperture pointing to RAM
> > agpgart: Aperture from AGP @ de000000 size 4096 MB
> > agpgart: Aperture too small (0 MB)
> >
>
> did you apply the patch like the attached that i sent you in another mail?
This dmesg is from a kernel without the patch.
The dmesg with the patch applied was sent in a separate message:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/13/122
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-13 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-10 19:59 x86 git tree broken Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-10 20:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-10 20:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-10 20:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-10 20:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-10 22:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-11 19:26 ` x86 git tree broken (bisected) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-11 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-11 20:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-11 20:26 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-11 20:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-11 21:11 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-11 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-11 21:31 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13 8:24 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13 8:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13 16:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-14 9:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-13 16:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-13 18:07 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13 18:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2008-04-13 18:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13 18:54 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13 22:00 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-13 22:32 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-13 23:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-14 0:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-14 0:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-14 0:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-14 1:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-14 9:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-14 18:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-14 20:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-14 21:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-14 21:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-14 21:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13 7:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-13 7:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13 7:58 ` [rfc] hw resource debugging checks (was: Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected)) Ingo Molnar
2008-04-13 8:18 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13 9:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-13 9:39 ` [rfc] hw resource debugging checks Andi Kleen
2008-04-13 17:53 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-13 18:19 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13 18:29 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-13 19:29 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-14 3:52 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-14 5:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-14 14:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-14 18:11 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13 15:48 ` [rfc] hw resource debugging checks (was: Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected)) Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-10 20:51 ` x86 git tree broken Ingo Molnar
2008-04-10 22:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-11 6:43 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] <fa.2mJjVaMdmV5IWp3mQiYHE1u4pHU@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.SO/I64FxJXD1oLBH54BTs4pc56c@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.fJC0A/aGr6H8XE94NUuvl1ixoc0@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.qs5oa+YMIJd6h2hpuGCULc8ODY4@ifi.uio.no>
2008-04-16 4:27 ` x86 git tree broken (bisected) Robert Hancock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200804132047.10221.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox