From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762181AbYDNVil (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:38:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755736AbYDNVie (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:38:34 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:49290 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753734AbYDNVid (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:38:33 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:34:09 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Rogan Dawes Cc: Adrian Bunk , chris@zankel.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] xtensa: don't offer PARPORT_PC Message-ID: <20080414223409.5ae3271c@core> In-Reply-To: <4803BF9D.4070304@dawes.za.net> References: <20080414195551.GE26885@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <4803BF9D.4070304@dawes.za.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Pardon a possibly stupid question here, but would it not make more sense > to code the architectures for which these various devices *are* > possible, rather than requiring each architecture to go through the > entire config file and add their own "we don't do this" for many entries? For any with PCI bus the right fix is to add the header files. -- -- "Alan, I'm getting a bit worried about you." -- Linus Torvalds