public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [patch 16/17] Immediate Values - Documentation
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:12:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080415001219.GC19596@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200804120106.52981.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

* Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au) wrote:
> On Friday 11 April 2008 11:16:47 Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au) wrote:
> > > On Thursday 10 April 2008 01:08:45 Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > > If you have to read the immediate values from a function declared as
> > > > __init or __exit, you should explicitly use _imv_read(), which will
> > > > fall back on a global variable read. Failing to do so will leave a
> > > > reference to the __init section after it is freed (it would generate a
> > > > modpost warning).
> > >
> > > That's a real usability wart.  Couldn't we skip these in the patching
> > > loop if required and revert so noone can make this mistake?
> >
> > Yeah, I know :(
> >
> > Well, only if we can find a way to detect the macro is put within a init
> > or exit section. Is there some assembly trickery that would permit us to
> > do that ?
> >
> > Otherwise, given the memory freed from the init section could be reused
> > later by the kernel, I don't see how we can detect the pointer leads to
> > a freed init section and, say, a module.
> 
> In theory although not in practice, since everyone vmallocs modules.  Let's 
> not rely on that tho.
> 
> How about we sweep the immediate table on init discard and remove/mark all the 
> init and exit references?
> 
> Cheers,
> Rusty.

I already posted a patch which nullifies the immediate values pointing
to init code after the init phase of the core kernel and the init phase
of modules, just before the init section is freed.

For the exit section, I could add some code which nullifies the
immediate values pointing to exit section for !CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD.
However, I would need to get the equivalent of init and init_size for
.exit too.

I wonder what would happen if someone declares a __exit function in a
builtin object, with an immediate value in it ? Is there a possibility
that it leaves a reference to code not even linked in ?

Mathieu


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-15  0:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-09 15:08 [patch 00/17] Text Edit Lock and Immediate Values for 2.6.25-rc8-mm1 Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-09 15:08 ` [patch 01/17] Kprobes - use a mutex to protect the instruction pages list Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-09 20:08   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-04-09 15:08 ` [patch 02/17] Kprobes - do not use kprobes mutex in arch code Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-09 20:08   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-04-09 15:08 ` [patch 03/17] Kprobes - declare kprobe_mutex static Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-09 20:08   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-04-09 15:08 ` [patch 04/17] x86 - Enhance DEBUG_RODATA support - alternatives Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-09 15:08 ` [patch 05/17] x86 Fix text_poke for vmalloced pages Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-09 15:08 ` [patch 06/17] x86 - Enhance DEBUG_RODATA support for hotplug and kprobes Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-09 15:08 ` [patch 07/17] Text Edit Lock - Architecture Independent Code Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-09 15:08 ` [patch 08/17] Text Edit Lock - kprobes architecture independent support Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-09 15:08 ` [patch 09/17] Add all cpus option to stop machine run Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-09 18:10   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-04-09 18:24     ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-10  3:34       ` Rusty Russell
2008-04-10  4:26       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-04-09 18:54     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-09 15:08 ` [patch 10/17] Immediate Values - Architecture Independent Code Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-09 15:08 ` [patch 11/17] Implement immediate update via stop_machine_run Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-10  8:04   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-04-10 20:01     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-11  4:50       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-04-09 15:08 ` [patch 12/17] Immediate Values - Kconfig menu in EMBEDDED Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-10  3:23   ` Rusty Russell
2008-04-10 19:32     ` [patch 12/17] Immediate Values - Kconfig menu in EMBEDDED (updated) Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-10 21:54       ` Rusty Russell
2008-04-14 23:52         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-09 15:08 ` [patch 13/17] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-09 18:01   ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-09 19:08     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-09 22:33       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-10  0:42         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-10  0:47           ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-09 20:21     ` [patch 13/17] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (updated) Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-09 22:33       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-09 23:15         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-09 15:08 ` [patch 14/17] Add text_poke and sync_core to powerpc Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-09 15:08 ` [patch 15/17] Immediate Values - Powerpc Optimization Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-09 15:08 ` [patch 16/17] Immediate Values - Documentation Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-10  3:33   ` Rusty Russell
2008-04-11  1:16     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-11 15:06       ` Rusty Russell
2008-04-15  0:12         ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2008-04-11 13:44     ` [RFC PATCH] Immediate Values Support init Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-09 15:08 ` [patch 17/17] Scheduler Profiling - Use Immediate Values Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-10  4:23 ` [patch 00/17] Text Edit Lock and Immediate Values for 2.6.25-rc8-mm1 KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-04-10  7:31 ` Takashi Nishiie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080415001219.GC19596@Krystal \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox