From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759580AbYDPHrw (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 03:47:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751687AbYDPHrl (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 03:47:41 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.174]:65349 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751305AbYDPHrl convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 03:47:41 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: Microblaze Linux release Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:44:41 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: monstr@seznam.cz, benh@kernel.crashing.org, Stephen Neuendorffer , John Williams , jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com, John Linn , git-dev@xilinx.com, Grant Likely , git@xilinx.com, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <48020A21.4000404@seznam.cz> <48059B92.7080601@seznam.cz> <18437.43836.175638.137415@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <18437.43836.175638.137415@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> X-Face: I@=L^?./?$U,EK.)V[4*>`zSqm0>65YtkOe>TFD'!aw?7OVv#~5xd\s,[~w]-J!)|%=]>=?utf-8?q?+=0A=09=7EohchhkRGW=3F=7C6=5FqTmkd=5Ft=3FLZC=23Q-=60=2E=60Y=2Ea=5E?= =?utf-8?q?3zb?=) =?utf-8?q?+U-JVN=5DWT=25cw=23=5BYo0=267C=26bL12wWGlZi=0A=09=7EJ=3B=5Cwg?= =?utf-8?q?=3B3zRnz?=,J"CT_)=\H'1/{?SR7GDu?WIopm.HaBG=QYj"NZD_[zrM\Gip^U MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804160944.42734.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19fK4JUaYLgqrnXSxjR8KNCLgqwKqBedR2RY+8 RbNr7WWBYgfjx4NrST+Zh3NhMRLE4NZNtEQDUaeVoZsF71zIPq vQEfv1cv+axxttJIbnJdw== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Michal Simek writes: > > > I think so. Sharing code among archs looks nice and this way is definitely > > right. But starting with communication with PowerPC guys that this code I want > > to use in case that this code is not in vanilla. This is not good start for > > doing this. > > I have a commit queued up that moves lmb.c into the top-level lib > directory so other architectures can use it easily.  Dave Miller > wanted this so he could use it for sparc64.  That will go into Linus' > tree when the merge window opens and will be in 2.6.26.  So I don't > see any reason why microblaze couldn't use the LMB stuff. > Right, fair enough. I was mostly objecting to the idea of creating another copy of the lmb code when bootmem should be sufficient for what microblaze needs. Using the code from lib/lmb.c sounds fair enough when it's already there. One more reason for the microblaze kernel to base on top of linux-next instead of mainline. Arnd <><