From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765648AbYDPOsX (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:48:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762612AbYDPOsO (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:48:14 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:56929 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757799AbYDPOsO (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:48:14 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:47:23 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andrew Morton Cc: Markus Metzger , andi-suse@firstfloor.org, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, markus.t.metzger@gmail.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, roland@redhat.com, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, eranian@googlemail.com, juan.villacis@intel.com Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] x86, ptrace: PEBS support Message-ID: <20080416144723.GI24383@elte.hu> References: <20080408110158.A9336@sedona.ch.intel.com> <20080415173534.b746f8da.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080415173534.b746f8da.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andrew Morton wrote: > Should we skip the RLIMIT_MEMLOCK check if capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)? > > It's a fairly large patch. btw., it's already in x86/testing (has been since last week) and hence it's in linux-next as well. it's still under the "needs some sort of positive noises from Roland" tag though ... Ingo