From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765593AbYDPTXA (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:23:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752670AbYDPTWl (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:22:41 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]:47886 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764932AbYDPTWj (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:22:39 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:from; b=bYN1UX2aWfo1UjNu5++tpj4Jq3RfoVKP03G8907H8HsZf2p89FdgZttdLsYVfKwhWENaA9Af56suSkAfJ1hI1hidCU4zqhPUcT1crSUJf3FkNm9J/J4LLAk/ekKCIZ8v4ghVaSOvz8W2cVeFc8z14lRHrQtdUB01VuaNyrMaHXk= To: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] rfkill support for r/w and r/o rfkill switches Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:26:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" References: <1207946244-14525-1-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br> <20080416183705.GA16123@tuxdriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20080416183705.GA16123@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804162126.43771.IvDoorn@gmail.com> From: Ivo van Doorn Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 16 April 2008, John W. Linville wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 05:37:16PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > > > This patch series (based on v2.6.25-rc8-mm2) has several improvements to > > the rfkill class that I need for thinkpad-acpi, plus two fluff and > > documentation fixes. > > Who is handling these rfkill patches? I think in the past they have > gone through me, but some may have gone directly to Dave M. Yes initial rfkill introduction went through wireless, but subsequent patches seemed to have gone directly into net-2.6. I must admit I am not sure what the correct flow for rkfill should be. :S > If they are coming to me, please collect Ivo's ACKs and resend them > to linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org with me CC'ed as well. I am going to setup a rfkill git tree from where rfkill can be managed, but I still had to look into the correct git tree to branch from. We should sort out how the rfkill patch flow should go, directly into net-2.6 or to wireless-2.6/wireless-testing Although rfkill is a wireless tool, one could argue that linux-wireless is mostly aimed at the 802.11 protocol, whereas rfkill applies to irda and bluetooth as well. Ivo