From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757627AbYDPUgn (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:36:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751359AbYDPUgc (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:36:32 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]:8511 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751089AbYDPUgc (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:36:32 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:from; b=Do9qC9yEpDy9keakI2dG4FcUpc6p0F09mkRl6nuPkVPib1nrNbGcBuOfDRPX/96vsr7Z60prnWMA+xWU01hHyQpjJBQikPgoXMDDlCn1kiUGnkNnGfcnhBOfNMbKOaone0ZkVXddry48W7oNFu8IO1PN//OWNCtCXJae3/d6VcU= To: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] rfkill support for r/w and r/o rfkill switches Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:40:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" References: <1207946244-14525-1-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br> <200804162126.43771.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <20080416195822.GA25066@tuxdriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20080416195822.GA25066@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804162240.38704.IvDoorn@gmail.com> From: Ivo van Doorn Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 16 April 2008, John W. Linville wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 09:26:43PM +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > On Wednesday 16 April 2008, John W. Linville wrote: > > > > If they are coming to me, please collect Ivo's ACKs and resend them > > > to linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org with me CC'ed as well. > > > > I am going to setup a rfkill git tree from where rfkill can be managed, > > but I still had to look into the correct git tree to branch from. > > > > We should sort out how the rfkill patch flow should go, > > directly into net-2.6 or to wireless-2.6/wireless-testing > > Although rfkill is a wireless tool, one could argue that linux-wireless > > is mostly aimed at the 802.11 protocol, whereas rfkill applies to > > irda and bluetooth as well. > > I suppose you could manage it as a separate tree. Before this round of > patches, that would have seemed like overkill. :-) My only argument > would be that there are probably more users of rfkill in the wireless > (i.e. wireless LAN) trees than in the Bluetooth, UWB, or WiMAX trees. > But honestly, it is up to you and Dave. I'm happy to take the patches > in my trees or you guys can arrange something else. Dave, do you want the rfkill patches directly, or should they go through the wireless tree first? > Just let me know if you want me to merge them. Otherwise, I'll drop > them from my queue. Well the patches from Henrique shouldn't be applied yet, since he is reworking several of those patches. Ivo