From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754692AbYDRKp3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2008 06:45:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751091AbYDRKpU (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2008 06:45:20 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:50708 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751055AbYDRKpU (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2008 06:45:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03:44:26 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Marker probes in futex.c Message-Id: <20080418034426.f710cbb9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1208260942.6395.6.camel@twins> References: <20080415115058.GA6788@in.ibm.com> <20080415115314.GA6975@in.ibm.com> <1208260942.6395.6.camel@twins> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:02:22 +0200 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 17:23 +0530, K. Prasad wrote: > > > + trace_mark(futex_wait_called, "uaddr:%p fshared:%p val:%u " > > + "abs_time:%p bitset:%d", > > + uaddr, fshared, val, abs_time, bitset); > > This is some seriuosly ugly looking gunk, why would we want stuff like > that scattered across the code? My 2c: if we even begin to countenance merging stuff like that, it's time for all the trace code to be removed. Nope, it wasn't April 1st. Guys, get a grip.