From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Tomasz Kłoczko" <kloczek@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [v2.6.26] what's brewing in x86.git for v2.6.26
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:42:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080418094239.GA26393@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.63.0804181059090.2102@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl>
* Tomasz Kłoczko <kloczek@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl> wrote:
>> and you'll see the trace events go by, live. The user-space bits of
>> sysprof have been ported over to ftrace/sysprof already and it's a
>> really nice tool that shows a deep stack-trace based hierarchical
>> "vertical" profile instead of the usual finegrained profile.
>
> Does it meany Linux give up implementing DTrace way of
> tracing/instrumntation ? In last time I observe more and more signs
> inroducing parallel ways of tracing/instrumentations infrasctructures
> in Linux kernel where all this can be rolled into only one .. common.
the goal of having more generic markers is still possible and being
aimed for - for in-kernel utilization like SystemTap, lttng, utrace,
ftrace and similar. The latest iteration of markers looks rather
promising in terms of giving us near-zero-cost probe points.
(and last i checked dtrace was not capable of doing something like
mmiotrace - so it's a different thing.)
so dont worry :)
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-18 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-16 20:23 [v2.6.26] what's brewing in x86.git for v2.6.26 Ingo Molnar
2008-04-16 20:37 ` Roland Dreier
2008-04-16 22:18 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-04-16 20:50 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-17 10:06 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-17 10:51 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-17 13:33 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-18 8:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 10:51 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-17 7:25 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 7:45 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-17 8:20 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 8:32 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-04-17 8:34 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-17 8:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 8:42 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 11:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-17 11:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 18:01 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 18:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 19:57 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 20:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 9:33 ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2008-04-18 9:42 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-04-17 8:14 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 8:57 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-17 10:32 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-17 10:50 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 11:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-17 17:36 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 8:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 8:40 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 8:45 ` David Miller
2008-04-17 8:54 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 8:56 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 9:19 ` David Miller
2008-04-17 9:33 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 9:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 9:18 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 9:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 9:36 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 9:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 10:06 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 10:11 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-17 10:18 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 10:29 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-17 10:19 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-17 10:33 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 10:42 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-18 11:12 ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-17 14:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-17 15:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 12:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 10:41 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-17 18:47 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-17 19:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 19:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 19:39 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-17 19:43 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 20:39 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-17 20:55 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 9:53 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 7:48 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 6:27 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 6:38 ` David Miller
2008-04-18 7:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 8:00 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 8:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-18 8:18 ` David Miller
2008-04-18 12:48 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080418094239.GA26393@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kloczek@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox