public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
	Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Voyager phys_cpu_present_map compile error
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:03:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080421200330.GJ8770@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1208792559.3640.20.camel@localhost.localdomain>


* James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> wrote:

> > > i ended up excluding Voyager configs from our test space some time 
> > > ago (and VISWS as well - there's one more visws fix in x86.git), 
> > > that's how this broke. These subarchitectures seem not to be used 
> > > at all and the code wont boot on normal PCs. We could mark it 
> > > BROKEN but the fix seems simple in any case.
> 
> I did actually try to avoid these problems by booting the -mc tree on 
> voyager, but I note that none of these issues showed up in that tree 
> the last time I did this (admittedly about 3 weeks ago because of 
> various conferences etc).

btw., any chance to turn it into a quirk space thing? Voyagers are 
almost-PCs, right? Most of the Voyager specialities appears to be 
abstracted away already via smp_ops. I.e. we could have Voyager support 
in a plain x86 kernel, if CONFIG_X86_VOYAGER is turned on.

quirks we can let survive almost forever - we've still got the math-emu 
code for example. It's the subarch code we'd like to eliminate 
eventually. (there are much better abstractions for achieving the same 
thing: quirks and the genapic code)

OTOH, i just had a look at it, and it seems a rather special thing - it 
tries to do like a PC but without actually being a PC. Almost as if it 
had no or just a little bit of BIOS - the whole Voyager kernel seems to 
run on the bare metal. Not much point in upsetting that code base i 
suspect.

let us know if you run into any difficulties with making it to boot 
again ... nothing truly fundamental should have changed to break it, 
other that this moving around of SMP code.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-21 20:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-21  0:02 Voyager phys_cpu_present_map compile error Adrian Bunk
2008-04-21  8:53 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-21 12:00   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-21 12:55     ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-21 14:10       ` Status of SGI 320/540 (Visual Workstation) support? Adrian Bunk
2008-04-22  6:19         ` Andrey Panin
2008-04-22 13:29       ` Voyager phys_cpu_present_map compile error Andrew Morton
2008-04-22 15:25         ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-04-21 13:00     ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-21 15:42       ` James Bottomley
2008-04-21 20:03         ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-04-21 23:08           ` James Bottomley
2008-04-21 19:55       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-21 20:03         ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-21 20:11           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-21 20:10             ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-23  8:53             ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-21 13:27     ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-21 20:14       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-21 21:57         ` James Bottomley
2008-04-25 14:50         ` James Bottomley
2008-04-25 16:17           ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-25 16:33             ` James Bottomley
2008-04-28 17:59               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 19:09                 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-21 15:58     ` James Bottomley
2008-04-21 19:51       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-21 20:09         ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-21 20:13           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-21 20:26             ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-21 20:29               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-21 21:02                 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-21 22:31                   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26  7:43                     ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-27  0:44                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27  1:06                         ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-27  1:45                           ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080421200330.GJ8770@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=astarikovskiy@suse.de \
    --cc=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox