From: Brandon Philips <brandon@ifup.org>
To: Gregor Jasny <jasny@vidsoft.de>
Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25 regression: vivi - scheduling while atomic
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:37:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080421223751.GD9073@plankton.ifup.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080421081639.GE26724@vidsoft.de>
On 10:16 Mon 21 Apr 2008, Gregor Jasny wrote:
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff803efc9b>] schedule+0xe5/0x5c7
> [<ffffffff80251c90>] __rmqueue_smallest+0x88/0x107
> [<ffffffff8023e84b>] getnstimeofday+0x2f/0x83
> [<ffffffff8023cf8a>] ktime_get_ts+0x17/0x48
> [<ffffffff803f0424>] schedule_timeout+0x1e/0xad
> [<ffffffff80220498>] enqueue_task+0x13/0x1e
> [<ffffffff803efab8>] wait_for_common+0xf6/0x16b
> [<ffffffff802230a0>] default_wake_function+0x0/0xe
> [<ffffffff8023a270>] kthread_create+0xa3/0x108
> [<ffffffff880d2471>] :vivi:vivi_thread+0x0/0x779
> [<ffffffff802634cb>] remap_vmalloc_range+0xa1/0xe6
> [<ffffffff80231242>] lock_timer_base+0x26/0x4c
> [<ffffffff8023138e>] __mod_timer+0xb6/0xc5
> [<ffffffff880d23fc>] :vivi:vivi_start_thread+0x54/0xc9
> [<ffffffff88053603>] :videobuf_core:videobuf_streamon+0x6c/0xaa
> [<ffffffff8809dba3>] :videodev:__video_do_ioctl+0x1327/0x2ad9
> [<ffffffff80222d76>] __wake_up+0x38/0x4f
> [<ffffffff80242f1f>] futex_wake+0xdb/0xfa
> [<ffffffff8809f6ab>] :videodev:video_ioctl2+0x17c/0x210
> [<ffffffff8025bb36>] handle_mm_fault+0x6b1/0x6cb
> [<ffffffff8027b47d>] vfs_ioctl+0x55/0x6b
> [<ffffffff8027b6e6>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x253/0x264
> [<ffffffff8027b733>] sys_ioctl+0x3c/0x5d
> [<ffffffff8020afcb>] system_call_after_swapgs+0x7b/0x80
>
> This happenes on a vanilla 2.6.25 with loaded nvidia graphics module.
> System architecture is x86_64. If it matters I'll try to reproduce this
> error on a non tainted kernel.
No need to reproduce on a non-tainted Kernel. This is a known issue
with patches merged into the v4l-dvb tree several weeks ago but it seems
to not have made it into 2.6.25 :(
http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/06eb92ed0b18
http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/c50180f4ddfc
I can rebase the patches for 2.6.25 but they are too big to go into the
stable 2.6.25 tree...
Thanks for the report,
Brandon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-21 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-21 8:16 2.6.25 regression: vivi - scheduling while atomic Gregor Jasny
2008-04-21 22:37 ` Brandon Philips [this message]
2008-04-22 0:08 ` hermann pitton
2008-04-22 13:29 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-22 14:35 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-04-22 19:17 ` hermann pitton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080421223751.GD9073@plankton.ifup.org \
--to=brandon@ifup.org \
--cc=jasny@vidsoft.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
--cc=video4linux-list@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox