From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] use canary at end of stack to indicate overruns at oops time
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:44:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080422084404.GA2388@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <480D5F27.1030101@redhat.com>
* Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> wrote:
> Use a canary at the end of the stack to clearly indicate at oops time
> whether the stack has ever overflowed.
>
> This is a very simple implementation with a couple of drawbacks:
>
> 1) a thread may legitimately use exactly up to the last
> word on the stack
>
> -- but the chances of doing this and then oopsing later seem slim
even that narrow case is a bug - an NMI might arrive at exactly that
point and overflow the stack for real.
> 2) it's possible that the stack usage isn't dense enough
> that the canary location could get skipped over
>
> -- but the worst that happens is that we don't flag the overrun
yeah.
> With the code in place, an intentionally-bloated stack oops does:
>
> BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff8103f84cc680
> IP: [<ffffffff810253df>] update_curr+0x9a/0xa8
> PGD 8063 PUD 0
> Thread overran stack or stack corrupted
> Oops: 0000 [1] SMP
> CPU 0
> ...
excellent. I've queued this up, it's definitely an improvement in
debuggability.
we used to have something comparable in ancient kernels (it was called
the stack red zone IIRC) - but it was not printed in oopses and we lost
the feature somewhere anyway.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-22 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-22 3:44 [PATCH] use canary at end of stack to indicate overruns at oops time Eric Sandeen
2008-04-22 4:20 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-22 8:44 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-04-22 16:44 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-04-22 17:18 ` [PATCH] Fix max-stack calculators to skip canary Eric Sandeen
2008-04-22 17:33 ` Joe Perches
2008-04-22 18:09 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-04-28 17:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-22 21:38 ` [PATCH V2] use canary at end of stack to indicate overruns at oops time Eric Sandeen
2008-04-22 22:14 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-04-22 22:28 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-04-28 17:31 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080422084404.GA2388@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox