From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, jeff@garzik.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: cdrom: use kmalloced buffers instead of buffers on stack
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:55:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080422115519.GB12774@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080422204637G.tomof@acm.org>
On Tue, Apr 22 2008, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:48:58 +0200
> tsbogend@alpha.franken.de (Thomas Bogendoerfer) wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:01:26PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > > cdrom: use kmalloced buffers instead of buffers on stack
> > > >
> > > > If cdrom commands are issued to a scsi drive in most cases the buffer
> > > > will be
> > > > filled via dma. This leads to bad stack corruption on non coherent
> > > > platforms,
> > > > because the buffers are neither cache line aligned nor is the size a
> > > > multiple
> > > > of the cache line size. Using kmalloced buffers avoids this.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> > > >---
> > > > drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c | 274
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > > 1 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Eh... AFAICS this is only really useful in two of the cases converted.
> > >
> > > For all the other cases (<= 32 bytes), it is _far_ less complex, far
> > > less code to simply communicate the additional alignment requirements to
> > > the compiler.
> > >
> > > What about __attribute__ __aligned__? Was that tried?
> >
> > I used that while narrowing down the bug. But not only the alignment is
> > important, but also size needs to be a multiple of the cache line size.
> > Which means it needs to be 128 bytes for most SGI machines. That
> > and the following in DMA-mapping.txt
> >
> > "This rule also means that you may use neither kernel image addresses
> > (items in data/text/bss segments), nor module image addresses, nor
> > stack addresses for DMA."
> >
> > let me choose the kmalloc() solution.
>
> Can we advertise such architecture's dma restrictions? For example, if
> we can update dma_pad_mask and dma_alignment in request_queue,
> blk_rq_map_kern uses a proper bounce buffer for such
> architectures. Then we can avoid putting extra complexity in uppper
> drivers such as cdrom.c
That would work fine, if cdrom was then also updated to get rid of
->generic_packet() and use the regular queue transport instead. Which
would be a VERY nice thing to do anyway, so I'd welcome the effort :-)
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-22 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200804220100.m3M10sva024025@hera.kernel.org>
2008-04-22 2:01 ` cdrom: use kmalloced buffers instead of buffers on stack Jeff Garzik
2008-04-22 2:03 ` David Miller
2008-04-22 5:48 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2008-04-22 6:33 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 11:47 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-22 11:55 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2008-04-22 11:59 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-22 12:04 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 12:25 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-22 12:30 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080422115519.GB12774@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox