From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932835AbYDVNwT (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:52:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1765650AbYDVNvy (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:51:54 -0400 Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.214.228]:12782 "EHLO hu-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763121AbYDVNvx (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:51:53 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=V786tcQXWhEVeqgtq5vYCBkGYEcHE14v5wTnORX3XylpHgHmrb4SQlDE+It7hDk5Or25fMXinwYM5oujaf5iVXdAA4x8JlyrFOJ4NiCYU4QiO9vzzgMBKBBnu2JFvjfElYOM+8PbqvO33/TBoJGQaiq7EkBMPWCvKZIIq7IgRiw= From: Denys Vlasenko To: Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: x86: 4kstacks default Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:51:11 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: David Chinner , Eric Sandeen , Alan Cox , Shawn Bohrer , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Arjan van de Ven , Thomas Gleixner References: <20080419142329.GA5339@elte.hu> <200804221448.09828.vda.linux@googlemail.com> <20080422130155.GA16895@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> In-Reply-To: <20080422130155.GA16895@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804221551.11488.vda.linux@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 22 April 2008 15:01, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Sent a few. > > I would like to ask you to ACK/NAK every individual patch > > in some reasonable period of time, say, 1-3 days. If you NAK a patch, > > please let me know what is wrong with it. > >... > > I know the feeling of resending patches again and again without any > reaction quite well, but that's not David's fault and not true for XFS > patches, so when you try to put pressure on him you hit the wrong > person. Yeah, sorry about that. I was not implying that XFS people were not responsive. -- vda