From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764142AbYDVPii (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:38:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762119AbYDVPi2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:38:28 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:57391 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758096AbYDVPi0 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:38:26 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Kyle McMartin Subject: Re: [RFC] Introduce __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SYSFS Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:38:19 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Will Newton , Linux Kernel list , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org References: <87a5b0800804220513t75690ceao938a288596b5ad0c@mail.gmail.com> <20080422152122.GF19802@phobos.i.cabal.ca> In-Reply-To: <20080422152122.GF19802@phobos.i.cabal.ca> X-Face: I@=L^?./?$U,EK.)V[4*>`zSqm0>65YtkOe>TFD'!aw?7OVv#~5xd\s,[~w]-J!)|%=]>=?utf-8?q?+=0A=09=7EohchhkRGW=3F=7C6=5FqTmkd=5Ft=3FLZC=23Q-=60=2E=60Y=2Ea=5E?= =?utf-8?q?3zb?=) =?utf-8?q?+U-JVN=5DWT=25cw=23=5BYo0=267C=26bL12wWGlZi=0A=09=7EJ=3B=5Cwg?= =?utf-8?q?=3B3zRnz?=,J"CT_)=\H'1/{?SR7GDu?WIopm.HaBG=QYj"NZD_[zrM\Gip^U MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804221738.19635.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19XG/oviSbnfXcw9HaG2onwJqu9paORrDgctF9 OUvoVcuHVXS5CG+gYfrkHEsKRtxqwreDJYUUI23pwi6jAJmFpw 4BU0IaXX59RY56MxJRsuA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Kyle McMartin wrote: > > This should (imnsho, at least), >         1 - Add a cond_syscall for sys_sysfs to sys_ni.c >         2 - Use a CONFIG_EMBEDDED dependent option that defaults on, >             possibly depend on BLACKFIN if you really want to. > > Adding this junk to every arch header is, in my opinion, completely > unacceptable just because blackfin wants to be different. It's not that they want to be different, but rather that I (among others) requested that they don't implement obsolete syscalls, so they removed it from their syscall table. Arnd <><