From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S932135AbYDVXHj@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932135AbYDVXHj (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:07:39 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757382AbYDVXH3
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:07:29 -0400
Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:43435 "EHLO relay.sgi.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1756455AbYDVXH3 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:07:29 -0400
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:07:27 -0500
From: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@qumranet.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
       Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
       kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Kanoj Sarcar <kanojsarcar@yahoo.com>,
       Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
       Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
       Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>, general@lists.openfabrics.org,
       Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
       Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01 of 12] Core of mmu notifiers
Message-ID: <20080422230727.GR30298@sgi.com>
References: <ea87c15371b1bd49380c.1208872277@duo.random> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804221315160.3640@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <20080422223545.GP24536@duo.random>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080422223545.GP24536@duo.random>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> The only other change I did has been to move mmu_notifier_unregister
> at the end of the patchset after getting more questions about its
> reliability and I documented a bit the rmmod requirements for
> ->release. we'll think later if it makes sense to add it, nobody's
> using it anyway.

XPMEM is using it.  GRU will be as well (probably already does).