From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762717AbYDVXIg (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:08:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759169AbYDVXIB (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:08:01 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:46215 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933470AbYDVXIA (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:08:00 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:07:58 -0500 From: Robin Holt To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Christoph Lameter , Nick Piggin , Jack Steiner , Peter Zijlstra , kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Kanoj Sarcar , Roland Dreier , Steve Wise , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity , linux-mm@kvack.org, Robin Holt , general@lists.openfabrics.org, Hugh Dickins , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH 02 of 12] Fix ia64 compilation failure because of common code include bug Message-ID: <20080422230758.GS30298@sgi.com> References: <3c804dca25b15017b220.1208872278@duo.random> <20080422224352.GS24536@duo.random> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080422224352.GS24536@duo.random> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 01:22:55PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > Looks like this is not complete. There are numerous .h files missing which > > means that various structs are undefined (fs.h and rmap.h are needed > > f.e.) which leads to surprises when dereferencing fields of these struct. > > > > It seems that mm_types.h is expected to be included only in certain > > contexts. Could you make sure to include all necessary .h files? Or add > > some docs to clarify the situation here. > > Robin, what other changes did you need to compile? I only did that one > because I didn't hear any more feedback from you after I sent that > patch, so I assumed it was enough. It was perfect. Nothing else was needed. Thanks, Robin