From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757169AbYDWFD5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:03:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751327AbYDWFDs (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:03:48 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]:49070 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751326AbYDWFDr (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:03:47 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=aF7yPwXuKkmA3JqgI5ZFcBW+ky8XESfo3kyYQb77xfNjs18Po5NRvmQA77LXLV8DBMym+iWRlQ4IVO8Y0O8cAv9KoNo7W7O+aw6jVCp9j4X8ScIonaPO1opYaA6anGi2rWToqIdPpeGQfzmnHYQj/ndArzr/kRs33eQUUoUXW3o= From: Denys Vlasenko To: Romano Giannetti Subject: Re: x86: 4kstacks default Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:03:11 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: Daniel Hazelton , linux-kernel References: <200804181737.m3IHbabI010051@hera.kernel.org> <200804201144.33308.dhazelton@enter.net> <1208888454.10279.7.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1208888454.10279.7.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804230703.11816.vda.linux@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 22 April 2008 20:20, Romano Giannetti wrote: > On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 11:44 -0400, Daniel Hazelton wrote: > > Since the second-most-common reason for stack overages is ndiswrapper... Well, > > with there being so much more hardware now supported directly by the linux > > kernel... > > How would I like you being right... Atheros AR5008, AR5414 PHY, "not yet > here". It's almost one year now since I bought this laptop, and till now > it's the cable or ndiswrapper. But yes, it's going better. For my first > wifi laptop I waited two and a half years, now it seems that in a bit > more than one there will be an open source driver... > > I know all the trouble ndiswrapper signify. But I see also that people > around me with a laptop and linux use more ndiswrapper than a real > driver, so... be gentle with it. Nobody knows how much potential development is not done because "you can make your wifi work with ndiswrapper". -- vda