From: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: [PATCH] disable softlockup detection at boottime
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:16:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080423201613.GA8546@sgi.com> (raw)
This patch allows softlockup detection to be disabled by specifying
a boottime parameter.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Index: linux/kernel/softlockup.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/softlockup.c 2008-04-23 13:50:06.000000000 -0500
+++ linux/kernel/softlockup.c 2008-04-23 14:39:36.267398531 -0500
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, tou
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, print_timestamp);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_struct *, watchdog_task);
+static int __read_mostly softlockup_off;
static int __read_mostly did_panic;
unsigned long __read_mostly softlockup_thresh = 60;
@@ -53,7 +54,8 @@ void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
{
int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
- __raw_get_cpu_var(touch_timestamp) = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
+ if (!softlockup_off)
+ __raw_get_cpu_var(touch_timestamp) = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(touch_softlockup_watchdog);
@@ -61,6 +63,9 @@ void touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs(void
{
int cpu;
+ if (softlockup_off)
+ return;
+
/* Cause each CPU to re-update its timestamp rather than complain */
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
per_cpu(touch_timestamp, cpu) = 0;
@@ -79,6 +84,9 @@ void softlockup_tick(void)
struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs();
unsigned long now;
+ if (softlockup_off)
+ return;
+
if (touch_timestamp == 0) {
touch_softlockup_watchdog();
return;
@@ -306,9 +314,19 @@ __init void spawn_softlockup_task(void)
void *cpu = (void *)(long)smp_processor_id();
int err = cpu_callback(&cpu_nfb, CPU_UP_PREPARE, cpu);
+ if (softlockup_off)
+ return;
+
BUG_ON(err == NOTIFY_BAD);
cpu_callback(&cpu_nfb, CPU_ONLINE, cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&cpu_nfb);
atomic_notifier_chain_register(&panic_notifier_list, &panic_block);
}
+
+static int __init disable_softlockup_detection(char *str)
+{
+ softlockup_off = 1;
+ return 1;
+}
+__setup("nosoftlockup", disable_softlockup_detection);
next reply other threads:[~2008-04-23 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-23 20:16 Dimitri Sivanich [this message]
2008-04-23 21:55 ` [PATCH] disable softlockup detection at boottime Randy Dunlap
2008-04-23 22:24 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2008-04-28 16:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 18:52 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2008-04-29 12:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-29 12:44 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2008-04-29 14:13 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080423201613.GA8546@sgi.com \
--to=sivanich@sgi.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox