From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756262AbYDWVC1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:02:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753894AbYDWVCS (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:02:18 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.188]:54374 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753394AbYDWVCR (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:02:17 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: Microblaze Linux release Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:01:45 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: monstr@seznam.cz, Paul Mackerras , benh@kernel.crashing.org, Stephen Neuendorffer , John Williams , jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com, John Linn , git-dev@xilinx.com, Grant Likely , git@xilinx.com, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <48020A21.4000404@seznam.cz> <480FA235.8000203@seznam.cz> <200804232257.04060.florian.fainelli@telecomint.eu> In-Reply-To: <200804232257.04060.florian.fainelli@telecomint.eu> X-Face: I@=L^?./?$U,EK.)V[4*>`zSqm0>65YtkOe>TFD'!aw?7OVv#~5xd\s,[~w]-J!)|%=]>=?utf-8?q?+=0A=09=7EohchhkRGW=3F=7C6=5FqTmkd=5Ft=3FLZC=23Q-=60=2E=60Y=2Ea=5E?= =?utf-8?q?3zb?=) =?utf-8?q?+U-JVN=5DWT=25cw=23=5BYo0=267C=26bL12wWGlZi=0A=09=7EJ=3B=5Cwg?= =?utf-8?q?=3B3zRnz?=,J"CT_)=\H'1/{?SR7GDu?WIopm.HaBG=QYj"NZD_[zrM\Gip^U MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804232301.46764.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/5Bhnl2RnczqUBkHero0tL+I78r8/NN3kDrm7 TVuYdzyMlNU5cNEiY9Viygu1tjCjrTkOJYqVZ2x4zAGp5hyxbu ZBJcrS7zPjCFCeHgR04HQ== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 23 April 2008, Florian Fainelli wrote: > While reading the previous discussion, I wondered that keeping PCI would be a > good idea. I am personnaly using it for a custom design and would be glad > being able to continue using it. > > If this represents too much work for you, we can probably add it later. > The problem as far as I can see is that the existing header files just don't work without a platform implementation. I think it would be less confusing to leave them out. If you need PCI, it's probably easier to add new files for these and get them working at the same time. Arnd <><