Re: [PATCH 1/2] klist: implement KLIST_INIT() and DEFINE_KLIST()

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:10:11PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> These locks don't nest so being in the same class should be okay and I 
>>> was following what (at least some of) other __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED users 
>>> are doing.  If putting these locks into separate classes is the RTTD, 
>>> sure.
>> Ah, they'll actually be in seprate classes all of the same name. So I
>> think it is cleaner to cause them to have separate names too.
>> see look_up_lock_class() in kernel/lockdep.c:
>>         /*
>>          * Static locks do not have their class-keys yet - for them the 
>> key
>>          * is the lock object itself:
>>          */
>>         if (unlikely(!lock->key))
>>                 lock->key = (void *)lock;
>
> Ah.. I'll put change it to name.  Thanks.

Do you have a new revision of this patch series that I can apply to my
trees?

thanks,

greg k-h