From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752980AbYD0EzY (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2008 00:55:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751511AbYD0EzO (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2008 00:55:14 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:58512 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751502AbYD0EzN (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2008 00:55:13 -0400 Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 21:55:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20080426.215513.141243565.davem@davemloft.net> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: mingo@elte.hu, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk Subject: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING From: David Miller X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo, why the heck is this hiding under arch/x86/ and not in lib/Kconfig.debug where it belongs? x86: add optimized inlining If there are platforms that can't handle it, we can add a conditional to lib/Kconfig.debug, but by default it should be made available generically. Where did this original patch get posted for review and discussion? Tell me where!?!?! The only references I see is where Stephen Rothwell complained that it broke the powerpc build, and then on the git commit list when Linus sucked this crud in.