From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756660AbYD0GIS (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2008 02:08:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751010AbYD0GIJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2008 02:08:09 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:57028 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750812AbYD0GII (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2008 02:08:08 -0400 Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 23:08:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20080426.230807.144232984.davem@davemloft.net> To: mingo@elte.hu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20080427055943.GA16290@elte.hu> References: <20080426.215513.141243565.davem@davemloft.net> <20080427055943.GA16290@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ingo Molnar Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 07:59:43 +0200 > ... as i saw no reason why this feature, which i found rather useful, > should be delayed another year or so. I'd be more than happy to promote > this feature back to lib/Kconfig.debug, sparc64 interest would make that > a strong argument. So you caved in to FUD in order to pad your commit and signoff count? Because anyone who is paying attention can see clearly that you're trying to push as much stuff as quickly as possible into Linus's tree with your singoffs and authorship on it this merge window. Gee, I wonder why...