From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757975AbYDZPlw (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:41:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754020AbYDZPlp (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:41:45 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:43190 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754003AbYDZPlo (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:41:44 -0400 Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:41:23 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Gabriel C Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" , Arjan van de Ven , "Siddha, Suresh B" , Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [git pull] x86 PAT changes Message-ID: <20080426154123.GA7295@elte.hu> References: <20080424225625.GB8717@elte.hu> <481330C6.7040109@googlemail.com> <20080426144203.GA19635@elte.hu> <48134C45.806@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48134C45.806@googlemail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Gabriel C wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Gabriel C wrote: > > > >> Hi Ingo, > >> > >> When using an 64bit ( didn't got time to test 32bit now ) kernel[1] > >> with PAT enabled , kvm-intel does not work anymore. > >> > >> When modprobing kvm-intel , kvm is saying VT extension is disable by > >> BIOS which isn't true. When disabling PAT again ( no changes to BIOS ) > >> kvm-intel works again here. > >> > >> Is that an known problem ? > > > > no, that side-effect was not known. Cc:-ed more folks. > > It seems like the update triggers some compiler bug. > > Setting CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=n fixed that btw. > > I don't have the time right now but later on today I will compile > gcc43_svn_branch and test again with CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y and see > what I get. > > Ingo sorry for the noise. no problem and it's not noise even if it turns out to be a compiler problem - we very much want to know about them when they affect the kernel. Ingo