From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760366AbYD0LQe (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2008 07:16:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752742AbYD0LQ0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2008 07:16:26 -0400 Received: from mtagate6.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.155]:1225 "EHLO mtagate6.de.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753244AbYD0LQ0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2008 07:16:26 -0400 Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:16:23 +0200 From: Heiko Carstens To: David Miller Cc: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, cooloney@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] blackfin checksum annotations Message-ID: <20080427111623.GA6754@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> References: <20080427052226.GP5882@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20080426.222644.74393287.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080426.222644.74393287.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:26:44PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Al Viro > Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 06:22:26 +0100 > > > > > Signed-off-by: Al Viro > > Since these are networking knobs and Al tends to test his > changes, I'll apply this to the net-2.6 tree. I don't think such arch specific patches should go in via net-2.6. You did that for a very similar patch for s390 and it was subtly broken: See: f994aae1bd8e4813d59a2ed64d17585fe42d03fc ("[NET]: S390 checksum annotations and cleanups.") and afbc1e994ddcf3b6fe2dc928ee8dc31a5d0c3118 ("[S390] Fix TCP/UDP pseudo header checksum computation.")