From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966542AbYD1SdW (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:33:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S966155AbYD1Sak (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:30:40 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.187]:56197 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966177AbYD1Sah (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:30:37 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=kbUbMTYwnU0t0gJZHtnBmPxdvIwnZFFrTmy6eLFgN7VDRhEJq2yMDBwbQNX5fvPl2PEMuorzUa6OwB83mCtjd2zhIbjzIRTc97sT5d1Y1eX1U04V1sZBDobvqIm7gZTlaH1C6+7uAe13bnm9ND/P/dvws10eU1jz4zmQHluDTFk= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] ARM: always select HAVE_IDE Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 23:06:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Adrian Bunk , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org References: <20080414141659.GF6695@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <200804272032.44273.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20080427202929.GB32762@uranus.ravnborg.org> In-Reply-To: <20080427202929.GB32762@uranus.ravnborg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804272306.01052.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 27 April 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > > > I do actually not care much how this gets resolved (we could even > > > ditch HAVE_IDE and provide asm/ide.h on all architectures) if there's > > > general agreement that this is the way to go. > > > > Seems like a way to go now that all crazy IDE core code vs arch code > > inter-dependiences have been fixed (the ideal solution would be to ditch > > asm/ide.h completely but this requires some more time/work). > > I invented HAVE_IDE in the past to make it trivial for arm to > use drivers/Kconfig. > And that incentive are not broken by your suggestion so fine with me. Cool. > But I really do not know about s390. They were the only one > without IDE in the past. They don't seem to support neither PCI nor ISA so I think that we should just special case them (== make IDE depend on BLOCK && !S390). Thanks, Bart