From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935860AbYD1Szo (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:55:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933509AbYD1Szd (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:55:33 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:44201 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932423AbYD1Szc (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:55:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:55:16 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Gregory Haskins Cc: Dmitry Adamushko , Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched fixes for suboptimal balancing Message-ID: <20080428185515.GF4491@elte.hu> References: <480DDC48.BA47.005A.0@novell.com> <20080423111313.4981.37345.stgit@novell1.haskins.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080423111313.4981.37345.stgit@novell1.haskins.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -0.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-0.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -0.5 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 5 to 20% [score: 0.1720] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Gregory Haskins wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > Here are my proposed fixes for the issue Dmitry has highlighted in: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/22/296 > > This is an RFC, and it applies to sched-devel. thanks Gregory - picked them up for more testing. Ingo