From: Daniel Klaffenbach <danielklaffenbach@gmail.com>
To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: "Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.25-stable PATCH] regression: powertop says 120K wakeups/sec
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:01:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804282001.06680.danielklaffenbach@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <924EFEDD5F540B4284297C4DC59F3DEEF31621@orsmsx423.amr.corp.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1921 bytes --]
Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> Did C1, C2 work fine with 2.6.24?
> Can you send me the full dmesg when it is failing to enter C1, C2 with
> latest git + patch.
> Output of
> #grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpuidle/*/*
> And also attach the acpidump output (pmtools package here
> http://www.lesswatts.org/projects/acpi/utilities.php)
No, C1/C2 did not seem to work with 2.6.24 - at least powertop reported 99,9%
C0 usage. It was the same behavior as after applying the wakeup patch.
However in 2.6.25 and 2.6.25-git11 C1/C2 worked correctly and C2 showed up in
pt. But after applying your patch to 2.6.25-git11 they did not:
git11:
PowerTOP version 1.9 (C) 2007 Intel Corporation
Cn Avg residency P-states (frequencies)
C0 (cpu running) ( 9,4%) 1,80 Ghz 100,0%
C1 0,0ms ( 0,0%) 1,60 Ghz 0,0%
C2 0,4ms (90,6%) 800 Mhz 0,0%
Wakeups-from-idle per second : 9051,0 interval: 5,0s
git11 with wakeup-patch:
PowerTOP version 1.9 (C) 2007 Intel Corporation
Cn Avg residency P-states (frequencies)
C0 (cpu running) (99,9%) 1,80 Ghz 100,0%
C1 0,0ms ( 0,0%) 1,60 Ghz 0,0%
C2 0,2ms ( 0,1%) 800 Mhz 0,0%
Wakeups-from-idle per second : 59,8 interval: 10,0s
In both cases the system was idle. I've uploaded the files you wanted:
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~klada/misc/kernel/cpuidle_git11.txt
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~klada/misc/kernel/cpuidle_git11_wakeuppatch.txt
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~klada/misc/kernel/dmesg_git11.txt
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~klada/misc/kernel/dmesg_git11_wakeuppatch.txt
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~klada/misc/kernel/nx6125_acpidump.out
If there is anything else I can do for debugging this issue please let me
know.
- Daniel
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-28 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-25 0:15 [2.6.25-stable PATCH] regression: powertop says 120K wakeups/sec Len Brown
2008-04-26 1:51 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2008-04-28 10:09 ` Daniel Klaffenbach
2008-04-28 16:36 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-04-28 18:01 ` Daniel Klaffenbach [this message]
2008-04-28 21:13 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-04-28 21:39 ` Ray Lee
2008-04-29 9:14 ` Daniel Klaffenbach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200804282001.06680.danielklaffenbach@gmail.com \
--to=danielklaffenbach@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox