From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756642AbYD2FtS (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:49:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752614AbYD2FtG (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:49:06 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.190]:12829 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752450AbYD2FtD (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:49:03 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=T2CbUUtwOZoQXTtYCfj6LE7ypd7SJZ4iLofjBD9+hZgfvn1yPJy0zlgA7Xam51yLqqVusHkDTt1fRHPbzu6iBuCx/kZujKWYivIR9/SDIE6GsRgcOdviGhe928mbavNeKQGcY3LeOCiwnXIehroVrqM5HJMMTbCrIz9XvqKCg3k= From: Denys Vlasenko To: Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: standalone kbuild's homepage? Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:48:12 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200804290503.50545.vda.linux@googlemail.com> <20080429051150.GB2262@uranus.ravnborg.org> In-Reply-To: <20080429051150.GB2262@uranus.ravnborg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804290748.12101.vda.linux@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 29 April 2008 07:11, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 05:03:50AM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > Hi Sam, folks, > > > > IIRC apart from in-kernel build system there is a "standalone" > > one, which is targeted at other projects wishing to reuse > > this excellent infrastructure. > > Unfortunately not. I have hoped to find time/energy to > extract the useful bits and do something so I could > offer kbuild to other projects. > But I do not see this happening soon :-( So far busybox uses almost unmodified kernel kbuild, mostly ignoring all the unused extra machinery (modules, System.map etc). Works great. I mean, _really_ great. Thanks! I found an old mail: http://busybox.net/lists/busybox/2006-September/024081.html >Also I notes that you took scripts/Makefile.build verbatim. >That file contains a lot of kernel cruft and you would be in a much >better position using scripts/Kbuild.klibc from klibc. Aha! this can be it. -- vda