Re: [patch 0/4] Bootmem cleanups

Johannes Weiner
2008-05-01T10:22:46Z

Hi Ingo,

Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> writes:

> * Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ingo,
>>
>> I now dropped the node-crossing patches from my bootmem series and
>> here is what is left over.
>>
>> They apply to Linus' current git
>> (0ff5ce7f30b45cc2014cec465c0e96c16877116e).
>>
>> Please note that all parts affecting !X86_32_BORING_UMA_BOX are
>> untested!
>>
>> arch/alpha/mm/numa.c | 8 ++--
>> arch/arm/mm/discontig.c | 34 ++++++++++-----------
>> arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c | 11 +++----
>> arch/m32r/mm/discontig.c | 4 +--
>> arch/m68k/mm/init.c | 4 +--
>> arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c | 3 +-
>> arch/parisc/mm/init.c | 3 +-
>> arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 3 +-
>> arch/sh/mm/numa.c | 5 +--
>> arch/sparc64/mm/init.c | 3 +-
>> arch/x86/mm/discontig_32.c | 3 +-
>> arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 6 +---
>> include/linux/bootmem.h | 7 +---
>> mm/bootmem.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> mm/page_alloc.c | 4 +--
>> 15 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
>
> i've read them and the changes all look sane and well-structured - but
> the impact is way too cross-arch for this to even touch x86.git i guess.
> I suspect this is for -mm?

Sorry, misunderstanding. I did not send it to the x86 guy but rather
the bootmem guy ;)

Andrew took them into -mm.

Thanks for your review!

Hannes