Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem

Tom Rini
2008-05-01T23:21:28Z

On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 03:42:38PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

[snip]
> Is there some vaguely maintainable workaround we can do? If the problem
> only affects completely-empty weak functions then we could put something in
> them to make them non-empty?

My memory is a tiny bit hazy (it was a while ago), but no, it's not just
empty functions (again, I _think_ I hit it with a generic vs arch weak
function).

--
Tom Rini