From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933969AbYEBAkV (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 May 2008 20:40:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757491AbYEBAkE (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 May 2008 20:40:04 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:32376 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757727AbYEBAkD (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 May 2008 20:40:03 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,424,1204531200"; d="scan'208";a="277048532" Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 17:39:48 -0700 From: Suresh Siddha To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Venki Pallipadi , Tom Rini , Andrew Morton , bunk@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com Subject: Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem Message-ID: <20080502003947.GB28173@linux-os.sc.intel.com> References: <20080429.212833.192304794.davem@davemloft.net> <924EFEDD5F540B4284297C4DC59F3DEEF7D18E@orsmsx423.amr.corp.intel.com> <20080501215633.GU29330@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <20080501152051.4eb4bad3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080501223515.GA11366@linux-os.sc.intel.com> <20080501154238.eccdb6ff.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080501232116.GD4354@smtp.west.cox.net> <20080501233038.GA20601@linux-os.sc.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 05:34:34PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Is it always about inlining? If so, can't we add a __noinline__ to the > declaration of __weak? We tried that and it was still getting inlined. thanks, suresh