From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937381AbYEBXRh (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 19:17:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932417AbYEBXR3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 19:17:29 -0400 Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:48525 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762397AbYEBXR2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 19:17:28 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 17:17:27 -0600 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Andrew Morton Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davej@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Extend list debugging to cover hlists Message-ID: <20080502231727.GQ14976@parisc-linux.org> References: <20080502182745.GL14976@parisc-linux.org> <20080502161403.fe596cca.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080502161403.fe596cca.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 04:14:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > linux-next is a better tree against which to prepare 2.6.x+1 patches. Is there a reason to wait for 2.6.x+1? People are having problems today with corrupt hlists. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."