From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1763048AbYECKHo@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1763048AbYECKHo (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sat, 3 May 2008 06:07:44 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755256AbYECKHh
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 3 May 2008 06:07:37 -0400
Received: from pasmtpa.tele.dk ([80.160.77.114]:46843 "EHLO pasmtpA.tele.dk"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755189AbYECKHg (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 3 May 2008 06:07:36 -0400
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 12:08:10 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
       "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
       Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86 git acpi issue?
Message-ID: <20080503100810.GA15645@uranus.ravnborg.org>
References: <481BAC6F.5090509@ct.jp.nec.com> <481BACEC.8080902@zytor.com> <20080503071332.GF5838@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805031123420.6003@apollo.tec.linutronix.de> <20080503094551.GA10805@elte.hu> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805031201130.6003@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805031201130.6003@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 12:02:37PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 3 May 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > Right. This Makefile is a nasty trap. I looked into it and the fix for 
> > > now is below. Long term this Makefile trickery needs to be cleaned up 
> > > to avoid trapping into this again.
> > 
> > Thanks Thomas, i messed up that commit - i should have known that the 
> > NUMAQ build fix looked _too_ easy ;-)
> 
> Also the move of 
> pci-$(CONFIG_ACPI)             += acpi.o
> is what broke things.
> 
> There is a nasty init function ordering problem as well between
> 
> pci-$(CONFIG_ACPI)             += acpi.o
> pci-y                          += legacy.o irq.o
> 
> Sigh.

This is the kind of stuff that has prevented me from
unifying the two Makefiles.
But if no-one beats me I will give it a shot soon.
It will be a microsteps because we will likeky hit
such issues.

	Sam