From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753480AbYECTmU (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 May 2008 15:42:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751984AbYECTmN (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 May 2008 15:42:13 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:39386 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751601AbYECTmM (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 May 2008 15:42:12 -0400 Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 21:41:49 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Roland McGrath , Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix rebuild of wakeup.bin Message-ID: <20080503194149.GC25097@elte.hu> References: <20080501010516.DD2FE26FA05@magilla.localdomain> <20080501093107.GA2392@uranus.ravnborg.org> <200805011248.53295.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080503180612.GD5292@elte.hu> <20080503181503.GB17990@uranus.ravnborg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080503181503.GB17990@uranus.ravnborg.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 08:06:12PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > Add wakeup.lds to list af targets to avoid rebuilding wakeup.bin - > > > > from Roland McGrath. > > > > > > Thanks for fixing this! > > > > > > Ingo, please merge. > > > > applied - thanks all! > > Just a note - I do not think this solves the problem Daniel has > reported with respect to first build of -next. I am awaiting more data > before I can analyse it further. yeah, i suspected that - that appears to be a race of some sort, i.e. a missing dependency coupled with parallelizable rules, not an over-eager dependency as fixed by this patch, right? Ingo