From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763933AbYEETG0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2008 15:06:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763794AbYEETFA (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2008 15:05:00 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:18918 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932722AbYEETE7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2008 15:04:59 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,439,1204531200"; d="scan'208";a="561011976" From: Jesse Barnes To: Frans Pop Subject: Re: fb layer & ioremap_wc Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 12:04:48 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" , "Packard, Keith" , "Yinghai Lu" , linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <200805022122.03576.elendil@planet.nl> <200805051045.31026.jesse.barnes@intel.com> <200805052059.01535.elendil@planet.nl> In-Reply-To: <200805052059.01535.elendil@planet.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200805051204.49135.jesse.barnes@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, May 05, 2008 11:59 am Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 05 May 2008, you wrote: > > On Monday, May 05, 2008 10:32 am Frans Pop wrote: > > > I suspect it could be vesafb/fbcon related instead. Normally I boot my > > > system with 'quiet vga=791', i.e. with vesafb. I then see the > > > artifacts. > > > > > > When I boot without 'vga=791', I hit another, unrelated regression > > > (which I'll report separately) [1]. > > > > > > When I boot with 'video=vfb:off', I do _not_ get the artifacts when X > > > exits. > > > > Ahhh, I missed that part of your config. That could definitely have an > > effect on things... You'll probably want something like the attached > > Not sure what to make of this. > With your patch I still get the artifacts, but they are displayed a lot > shorter. I get only a flash instead of a-2 seconds. Hm, so I guess some other user is still using UC on the region. [Note to fb list: the patch just made vesafb use ioremap_wc instead of ioremap). > > (there are other places in the fb layer that want similar treatment, > > iirc, maybe fb_pgprotect?). > > Do you want to try a more complete review/patch or should this be punted > over to the framebuffer folks? Yeah, those bits have changed since I last looked at them, hopefully the fb guys can help. Jesse