From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: djwong@us.ibm.com, mhoffman@lightlink.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] i5k_amb: Support Intel 5400 chipset
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 23:22:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080505232245.6003ac8a@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080505135621.66809b0e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, 5 May 2008 13:56:21 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 2 May 2008 21:55:59 -0700
> "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Minor rework to support the Intel 5400 chipset.
>
> Thanks, I added this to the for-git-hwmon part of the -mm queue.
>
> I haven't heard from Mark for quite some time so soon I might declare him
> absent and I'll go through my hwmon patches with a view to merging them into
> 2.6.26 directly.
For Mark's status see:
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2008-May/023006.html
I guess he'll be happy if you merge a couple patches for him.
>
> That queue currently consists of:
>
> hdaps-invert-the-axes-for-hdaps-on-lenovo-r61i-thinkpads.patch
> adt746x-logical-bitwise-confusion-in-set_max_duty_at_crit.patch
The adt7473:set_max_duty_at_crit() code was originally confusing but
correct. After this patch the code is clear but broken. Is it
considered an improvement?
(I would have told you before if that patch had been submitted to the
lm-sensors list as it should have, given that it modifies a hardware
monitoring driver... Not to mention that the patch file name doesn't
match the driver file name, just to add to the confusion.)
> adt7473-minor-documentation-update.patch
I reviewed and acked that one, it's ready to go.
> i5k_amb-support-intel-5400-chipset.patch
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-05 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-03 4:55 [PATCH] i5k_amb: Support Intel 5400 chipset Darrick J. Wong
2008-05-05 20:56 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-05 21:22 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2008-05-05 21:39 ` [lm-sensors] " Andrew Morton
2008-05-05 23:04 ` ibmaem driver status? Darrick J. Wong
2008-05-06 21:04 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-06 22:38 ` [resend] [PATCH v2] ibmaem: New driver for power/energy meters in IBM System X hardware Darrick J. Wong
2008-05-07 0:32 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 0:36 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 6:01 ` Jean Delvare
2008-05-07 6:11 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080505232245.6003ac8a@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=mhoffman@lightlink.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox