From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756061AbYEGAjo (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2008 20:39:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753337AbYEGAjd (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2008 20:39:33 -0400 Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:36748 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752934AbYEGAjc (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2008 20:39:32 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 19:39:31 -0500 From: Paul Jackson To: "Paul Menage" Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, sivanich@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 125/311] Cpuset hardwall flag: switch cpusets to use the bulk cgroup_add_files() API Message-Id: <20080506193931.3e009405.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <6599ad830805061726n33f69552k756e8754387e4b8c@mail.gmail.com> References: <200804290800.m3T80QFs009131@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <6599ad830804290329heea3c5fu7395b1ef71a87881@mail.gmail.com> <20080429053804.6d083a7f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080506192018.26c1e3b7.pj@sgi.com> <6599ad830805061726n33f69552k756e8754387e4b8c@mail.gmail.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul M wrote: > But I can send one against 2.6.26-rc1 directly if that helps. At this point, whatever resolves this with the least amount of additional effort and confusion on the parts of Linus, Andrew, Seto-san and yourself seems best. A few days one way or the other don't matter, so far as I know. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.940.382.4214