From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: "Paul Menage" <menage@google.com>
Cc: lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com, mingo@elte.hu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 20:58:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080506205852.8adaa0a2.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6599ad830805061851n767ff7a1qc8cb850ec98ad60d@mail.gmail.com>
Paul M wrote:
> I was just trying to get close to the original behaviour.
An honorable goal.
Li Zefan - would you be interested in generating a patch
that fails -EINVAL for inputs outside the range of [-1 ... N]
for whatever small positive N the kernel recognizes?
This seems like a minor enough difference that I for one
don't have any problem with the current code, remapping
all negative inputs to -1, going in, and then a follow-on
patch changing that going in afterward.
Of course, if you or Seto-san prefer the current behaviour,
it would be easy to persuade me to agree.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-07 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-07 1:08 [PATCH] Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file Paul Menage
2008-05-07 1:21 ` Li Zefan
2008-05-07 1:31 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 1:40 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 3:38 ` Reverting per-cpuset "system" (IRQ affinity) patch (was: Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file) Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 3:44 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 3:52 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 6:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-08 17:56 ` Reverting per-cpuset "system" (IRQ affinity) patch Max Krasnyansky
2008-05-09 10:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-09 11:26 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-21 0:46 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-05-07 1:38 ` [PATCH] Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 1:41 ` Paul Menage
2008-05-07 9:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-07 15:08 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 1:46 ` Li Zefan
2008-05-07 1:49 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 1:51 ` Paul Menage
2008-05-07 1:58 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2008-05-07 2:08 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 2:11 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 2:15 ` Paul Menage
2008-05-07 2:28 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 2:32 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 2:12 ` Li Zefan
2008-05-07 2:17 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 2:27 ` Hidetoshi Seto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080506205852.8adaa0a2.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox