Re: volanoMark regression with kernel 2.6.26-rc1

Dhaval Giani
2008-05-12T02:04:24Z

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:39:10AM +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 21:22 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> > On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 11:41:25AM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> > > The other combination that I am interested to know is when:
> > >
> > > CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=y and CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED=y
> > >
> > > [i.e cgroup based scheduling rather than uid based scheduling. Former
> > > should result in only one group at bootup]
> > >
> > > I will also try to get some numbers with this combination.
> >
> > I ran with that combination and here are some results:
> >
> > 2.6.25 (with CONFIG_USER_SCHED)
> >
> > Volanomark perf = 20436.6 (Avg of 10 runs)
> >
> > 2.6.26-rc1 + patches in Ingo's tree [1] as of Fri morning IST (abt 8 hrs
> > before) (with CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED)
> >
> > Volanomark perf = 21529.6
> >
> > i.e CGROUP based grouping in 2.6.26-rc1 gives same (if not somewhat
> > better) results as UID-based scheduling in 2.6.25.
> >
> > Yamin,
> > Could you validate this as well? i.e just turn on cgroup-based
> > grouping (CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED) and check the resulting performance with 2625
> > you already have (using CONFIG_USER_SCHED).
> >
> >
> > A) In 2.6.25, with UID based scheduling,
> > CPU load = summation of task load
> >
> > B) In 2.6.26-rc1, with UID based scheduling,
> > CPU load = summation of group weights
> >
> > C) In 2.6.26-rc1, with CGROUP based scheduling,
> > CPU load = summation of task weights
> I'm confused by these conceptions. Would you like to tell me the exact config options
> you want to turn on?
>
> Options in my config file(both 2.6.25 and 2.6.26-rc1):
>
> # CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set
> CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED=y
> CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=y
> # CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED is not set
> CONFIG_USER_SCHED=y
> # CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED is not set
>

This is fine for 2.6.25. For 2.6.26-rc1, can you turn off USER_SCHED adn
turn on CGROUP_SCHED?

--
regards,
Dhaval