From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757368AbYEGWnK (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2008 18:43:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762025AbYEGWmk (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2008 18:42:40 -0400 Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:40819 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762793AbYEGWmg (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2008 18:42:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 17:42:33 -0500 From: Jack Steiner To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter , Robin Holt , Nick Piggin , Peter Zijlstra , kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Kanoj Sarcar , Roland Dreier , Steve Wise , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity , linux-mm@kvack.org, general@lists.openfabrics.org, Hugh Dickins , Rusty Russell , Anthony Liguori , Chris Wright , Marcelo Tosatti , Eric Dumazet , "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH 08 of 11] anon-vma-rwsem Message-ID: <20080507224232.GA24600@sgi.com> References: <6b384bb988786aa78ef0.1210170958@duo.random> <20080507212650.GA8276@duo.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080507212650.GA8276@duo.random> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > And I don't see a problem in making the conversion from > spinlock->rwsem only if CONFIG_XPMEM=y as I doubt XPMEM works on > anything but ia64. That is currently true but we are also working on XPMEM for x86_64. The new XPMEM code should be posted within a few weeks. --- jack