From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764981AbYEHTzs (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2008 15:55:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752412AbYEHTzi (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2008 15:55:38 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:37779 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751837AbYEHTzg (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2008 15:55:36 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 12:43:14 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Len Brown Cc: Willy Tarreau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, Justin Forbes , Zwane Mwaikambo , "Theodore Ts'o" , Randy Dunlap , Dave Jones , Chuck Wolber , Chris Wedgwood , Michael Krufky , Chuck Ebbert , Domenico Andreoli , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Len Brown Subject: Re: [patch 00/16] Linux 2.6.25 -stable review Message-ID: <20080508194314.GA31149@suse.de> References: <20080508174122.GA855@suse.de> <20080508182233.GB2115@suse.de> <20080508183324.GA1874@1wt.eu> <200805081516.29907.lenb@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200805081516.29907.lenb@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 03:16:28PM -0400, Len Brown wrote: > On Thursday 08 May 2008, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 11:22:33AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 08:13:42PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 10:41:22AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.25.2 release. > > > > > There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to > > > > > this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let > > > > > us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants > > > > > to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it. > > > > > > > > Greg, shouldn't we also queue this one (may be in a later version) ? It's > > > > in mainline. > > > > > > What problem does it solve? > > > > from what I see in the code, currently acpi_power_get_state() will return > > 0 when setting resource to NULL, and some callers (eg: acpi_power_on()) > > will happily dereference resource if acpi_power_get_state() returns 0. So > > I guess there are circumstances where we can oops. > > > > > Does Len want it in -stable? > > > > I simply forgot to ask. I'm CCing him. > > This patch is correct. > > Go ahead and apply it -- it won't hurt anything. > I don't think it will help anything in real-life either, though. Ok, because of that, I'll not apply it, we want patches that actually fix reported problems. thanks, greg k-h