From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762043AbYEHVGU (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2008 17:06:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761115AbYEHVFy (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2008 17:05:54 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.187]:13242 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757755AbYEHVFw (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2008 17:05:52 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-disposition:message-id:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=H43VjqzlOhgqzGOEuTA65H1w/22YReIz2FCdQWKhj07qRj2YORKgu1s2kJNvzIjA4Tl1lCwNM7o0+2+TY7B/mh61iy8aiDCf1rTudE4gSacFcGYN6LAitCL29UrQB/RDW9jKgiF7YSkv1E/MjwAiapmfZWJgWvN5wsHeLAJ9XNA= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Russell King Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] ide: remove IDE_TFLAG_NO_SELECT_MASK taskfile flag Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 23:22:13 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sergei Shtylyov References: <200805071943.24296.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20080508205802.GA5722@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20080508205802.GA5722@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200805082322.13297.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 08 May 2008, Russell King wrote: > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 07:43:24PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Always call SELECT_MASK(..., 0) in ide_tf_load() (needs to be done > > to match ide_set_irq(..., 1)) and then remove IDE_TFLAG_NO_SELECT_MASK > > taskfile flag. > > > > This change should only affect hpt366 and icside host drivers since > > ->maskproc(..., 0) for sgiioc4 is equivalent to ide_set_irq(..., 1). > > Provided the two channels on icside are serialised (so IDE doesn't > try to enable IRQs on both channels at the same time) it shouldn't > be a problem. Yep, they are serialized. > However, since I don't use this driver anymore (using the PATA version > instead) I don't feel it's right for me to ack this change. Thanks for taking a look anyway. Bart