From: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>, Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>,
Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Packard,
Keith" <keith.packard@intel.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 13:09:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080509200930.GA12061@linux-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080509200519.GA10897@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 01:05:19PM -0700, Venki Pallipadi wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 12:08:18PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > I've tried doing it slightly differently below, don't know whether
> > > > you'll consider it an improvement or not.
> > >
> > > Hugh: Thanks for looking into this. Yes. I like your modified patch.
> > > Simpler and smaller.
> >
> > i have stuck your original patch into testing and nothing blew up so
> > far. Due to the mm/ bits this is not for the scope of x86.git, but
> > obviously it all looks good and is .26-worthy to me:
> >
> > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Tested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> >
> > Venki, could you please send a full patch against -git that has
> > everything from Hugh included, with an updated changelog, for
> > Linus/Andrew to ack/apply?
> >
>
> Ingo,
>
> Split up the patch into two parts as the pci part was unrelated to mprotect
> problem in a sense.
And the second patch for mprotect problem.
There is a defect in mprotect, which lets the user to change the page
cache type bits by-passing the kernel reserve_memtype and free_memtype
wrappers. Fix the problem by not letting mprotect change the PAT bits.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
---
include/asm-x86/pgtable.h | 16 +++++++++++++---
mm/mprotect.c | 11 ++++++++++-
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/mm/mprotect.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/mprotect.c 2008-05-09 10:50:28.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6/mm/mprotect.c 2008-05-09 11:01:23.000000000 -0700
@@ -26,6 +26,13 @@
#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
+#ifndef pgprot_modify
+static inline pgprot_t pgprot_modify(pgprot_t oldprot, pgprot_t newprot)
+{
+ return newprot;
+}
+#endif
+
static void change_pte_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, pgprot_t newprot,
int dirty_accountable)
@@ -192,7 +199,9 @@ success:
* held in write mode.
*/
vma->vm_flags = newflags;
- vma->vm_page_prot = vm_get_page_prot(newflags);
+ vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_modify(vma->vm_page_prot,
+ vm_get_page_prot(newflags));
+
if (vma_wants_writenotify(vma)) {
vma->vm_page_prot = vm_get_page_prot(newflags & ~VM_SHARED);
dirty_accountable = 1;
Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-x86/pgtable.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-x86/pgtable.h 2008-05-09 10:50:28.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6/include/asm-x86/pgtable.h 2008-05-09 11:01:23.000000000 -0700
@@ -57,7 +57,8 @@
#define _KERNPG_TABLE (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_RW | _PAGE_ACCESSED | \
_PAGE_DIRTY)
-#define _PAGE_CHG_MASK (PTE_MASK | _PAGE_ACCESSED | _PAGE_DIRTY)
+#define _PAGE_CHG_MASK (PTE_MASK |_PAGE_PCD | _PAGE_PWT | \
+ _PAGE_ACCESSED | _PAGE_DIRTY)
#define _PAGE_CACHE_MASK (_PAGE_PCD | _PAGE_PWT)
#define _PAGE_CACHE_WB (0)
@@ -288,12 +289,21 @@ static inline pte_t pte_modify(pte_t pte
* Chop off the NX bit (if present), and add the NX portion of
* the newprot (if present):
*/
- val &= _PAGE_CHG_MASK & ~_PAGE_NX;
- val |= pgprot_val(newprot) & __supported_pte_mask;
+ val &= _PAGE_CHG_MASK;
+ val |= pgprot_val(newprot) & (~_PAGE_CHG_MASK) & __supported_pte_mask;
return __pte(val);
}
+/* mprotect needs to preserve PAT bits when updating vm_page_prot */
+#define pgprot_modify pgprot_modify
+static inline pgprot_t pgprot_modify(pgprot_t oldprot, pgprot_t newprot)
+{
+ pgprotval_t preservebits = pgprot_val(oldprot) & _PAGE_CHG_MASK;
+ pgprotval_t addbits = pgprot_val(newprot);
+ return __pgprot(preservebits | addbits);
+}
+
#define pte_pgprot(x) __pgprot(pte_val(x) & (0xfff | _PAGE_NX))
#define canon_pgprot(p) __pgprot(pgprot_val(p) & __supported_pte_mask)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-09 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-02 19:22 [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes? Frans Pop
2008-05-02 19:37 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-05-02 20:40 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-05-02 21:55 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-05-02 22:07 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-05-04 7:10 ` Frans Pop
2008-05-04 9:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-04 20:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-05 16:55 ` Frans Pop
2008-05-05 17:00 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-05-05 17:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-05 18:56 ` Frans Pop
2008-05-05 15:57 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-05-05 17:32 ` Frans Pop
2008-05-05 17:45 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-05-05 17:59 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-05-05 18:59 ` Frans Pop
2008-05-05 19:04 ` fb layer & ioremap_wc Jesse Barnes
2008-06-13 16:42 ` Frans Pop
2008-05-06 22:42 ` [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes? Venki Pallipadi
2008-05-07 7:02 ` [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect Ingo Molnar
2008-05-07 19:18 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-05-07 23:23 ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-05-09 10:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-09 20:05 ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-05-09 20:09 ` Venki Pallipadi [this message]
2008-05-09 20:48 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-05-09 22:11 ` Dave Airlie
2008-05-09 22:20 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-05-10 6:19 ` Dave Airlie
2008-05-10 6:29 ` Keith Packard
2008-05-10 5:45 ` Keith Packard
2008-05-07 22:36 ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-05-25 15:08 ` [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes? Frans Pop
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080509200930.GA12061@linux-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=jesse.barnes@intel.com \
--cc=keith.packard@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox