From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1757789AbYEJTY4@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757789AbYEJTY4 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sat, 10 May 2008 15:24:56 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754639AbYEJTYs
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 10 May 2008 15:24:48 -0400
Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:52108 "EHLO
	ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754380AbYEJTYr (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 10 May 2008 15:24:47 -0400
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 20:24:46 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
       WANG Cong <wangcong@zeuux.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 4/9] fs/binfmt_script.c: fix resource leaks
Message-ID: <20080510192446.GD13907@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <1210254754206-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> <12102548233189-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <12102548233189-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 09:52:29PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
>  ->load_binary()'s caller only frees resources which ->load_binary() applied
> when it succeeded, so ->load_binary() itself should free the resources on
> failure.

Huh???  Just what does the end of do_execve() do in your opinion?