From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757936AbYEJTbU (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 May 2008 15:31:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753700AbYEJTbH (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 May 2008 15:31:07 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:55738 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754380AbYEJTbH (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 May 2008 15:31:07 -0400 Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 20:31:05 +0100 From: Al Viro To: WANG Cong Cc: LKML , Andrew Morton , WANG Cong Subject: Re: [Patch 7/9] fs/exec.c: fix wrong return value of prepare_binprm() Message-ID: <20080510193105.GG13907@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <1210254754206-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> <12102548553947-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <12102548553947-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 09:52:32PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: > All prepare_binprm()'s callers assume that prepare_binprm() fails > when it returns negative. However, prepare_binprm() most probably returns > the return value of kernel_read(), which may return positive on failure! > > Thus this should be fixed. Since when does read return positive on failure?