From: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Aneesh Kumar KV <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: volanoMark regression with kernel 2.6.26-rc1
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 07:34:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080512020402.GF15063@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1210556351.3151.2.camel@ymzhang>
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:39:10AM +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 21:22 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> > On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 11:41:25AM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> > > The other combination that I am interested to know is when:
> > >
> > > CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=y and CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED=y
> > >
> > > [i.e cgroup based scheduling rather than uid based scheduling. Former
> > > should result in only one group at bootup]
> > >
> > > I will also try to get some numbers with this combination.
> >
> > I ran with that combination and here are some results:
> >
> > 2.6.25 (with CONFIG_USER_SCHED)
> >
> > Volanomark perf = 20436.6 (Avg of 10 runs)
> >
> > 2.6.26-rc1 + patches in Ingo's tree [1] as of Fri morning IST (abt 8 hrs
> > before) (with CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED)
> >
> > Volanomark perf = 21529.6
> >
> > i.e CGROUP based grouping in 2.6.26-rc1 gives same (if not somewhat
> > better) results as UID-based scheduling in 2.6.25.
> >
> > Yamin,
> > Could you validate this as well? i.e just turn on cgroup-based
> > grouping (CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED) and check the resulting performance with 2625
> > you already have (using CONFIG_USER_SCHED).
> >
> >
> > A) In 2.6.25, with UID based scheduling,
> > CPU load = summation of task load
> >
> > B) In 2.6.26-rc1, with UID based scheduling,
> > CPU load = summation of group weights
> >
> > C) In 2.6.26-rc1, with CGROUP based scheduling,
> > CPU load = summation of task weights
> I'm confused by these conceptions. Would you like to tell me the exact config options
> you want to turn on?
>
> Options in my config file(both 2.6.25 and 2.6.26-rc1):
>
> # CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set
> CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED=y
> CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=y
> # CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED is not set
> CONFIG_USER_SCHED=y
> # CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED is not set
>
This is fine for 2.6.25. For 2.6.26-rc1, can you turn off USER_SCHED adn
turn on CGROUP_SCHED?
--
regards,
Dhaval
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-12 2:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-06 2:06 volanoMark regression with kernel 2.6.26-rc1 Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-06 5:41 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-06 11:52 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-07 17:33 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-08 5:18 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-08 5:32 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-08 5:40 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-08 5:53 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-08 6:04 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-08 6:11 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-09 15:52 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-09 15:54 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-12 1:39 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-12 2:04 ` Dhaval Giani [this message]
2008-05-12 2:37 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-12 3:33 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-12 4:52 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-12 5:02 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-12 5:43 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-12 9:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-12 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-14 9:22 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-14 13:44 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-14 14:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-14 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-15 8:20 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-15 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-15 17:10 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-07 7:04 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 9:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-07 9:33 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-07 17:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-07 18:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-08 6:07 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-08 5:20 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-08 5:34 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-08 6:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-07 17:42 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-08 5:21 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-08 5:39 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-08 6:03 ` Zhang, Yanmin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080512020402.GF15063@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox