public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: arges@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Maynard Johnson <maynardj@us.ibm.com>,
	Gianni Tedesco <gxt@cs.nott.ac.uk>,
	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net, Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: oprofile BUG() in current kernel.
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 01:40:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080513014010.e0723e01.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1210610283.7218.4.camel@snuffleupagus>

On Mon, 12 May 2008 11:38:03 -0500 Chris J Arges <arges@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > >>>
> > >>>       
> > >> This looks similar to:
> > >>
> > >> http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0805.0/2845.html
> > >>     
> > >
> > > Yes, remarkably similar ;)
> > >
> > >   
> > >> Does reverting 608dfddd845da5ab6accef70154c8910529699f7 fix it for you too?
> > >>     
> > Has this fix been officially reverted?
>
> Let me know if this change is going to be reverted, as I have a patch
> ready to support cpu hotplug for oprofile based on code post
> DEFINE_PER_CPU patch. 

Please don't top-post.  I repaired it so that I could reply sensibly.

In trying to reprocude this on a uniprocessor machine, it seems that
someone broke oprofile:

/usr/bin/opcontrol: line 911: /dev/oprofile/0/enabled: No such file or directory
/usr/bin/opcontrol: line 911: /dev/oprofile/0/event: No such file or directory
/usr/bin/opcontrol: line 911: /dev/oprofile/0/count: No such file or directory
/usr/bin/opcontrol: line 911: /dev/oprofile/0/kernel: No such file or directory
/usr/bin/opcontrol: line 911: /dev/oprofile/0/user: No such file or directory
/usr/bin/opcontrol: line 911: /dev/oprofile/0/unit_mask: No such file or directo

sony:/home/akpm> l /dev/oprofile
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 May 13 01:25 1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 May 13 01:25 backtrace_depth
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 May 13 01:25 buffer
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 May 13 01:25 buffer_size
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 May 13 01:25 buffer_watershed
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 May 13 01:25 cpu_buffer_size
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 May 13 01:25 cpu_type
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 0 May 13 01:25 dump
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 May 13 01:25 enable
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 May 13 01:25 pointer_size
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 May 13 01:25 stats

Looks like the "0" got renamed to "1".  Who did that?



So then I try it on the old 2-way:

No event named GLOBAL_POWER_EVENTS is available.
No event named GLOBAL_POWER_EVENTS is available.
No event named GLOBAL_POWER_EVENTS is available.
No event named GLOBAL_POWER_EVENTS is available.
No event named GLOBAL_POWER_EVENTS is available.

so that got broken too.

I queued the revert of 608dfddd845da5ab6accef70154c8910529699f7,
although that doesn't fix these regressions.

I see no oops.  And I don't see what's wrong with the fairly simple
per-cpu conversion, so I'd rather not revert what appears to be a good
patch when we don't understand what's going wrong.


Grasping at straws, we have had problems with per-cpu variable
initialisation in the past.  Does this

--- a/drivers/oprofile/cpu_buffer.c~a
+++ a/drivers/oprofile/cpu_buffer.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
 #include "buffer_sync.h"
 #include "oprof.h"
 
-DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct oprofile_cpu_buffer, cpu_buffer);
+DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct oprofile_cpu_buffer, cpu_buffer) = { };
 
 static void wq_sync_buffer(struct work_struct *work);
 
_

fix anything for anyone?


  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-13  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-12 12:02 oprofile BUG() in current kernel Gianni Tedesco
2008-05-12 12:19 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-05-12 13:31   ` Gianni Tedesco
2008-05-12 14:11     ` Maynard Johnson
2008-05-12 16:38       ` Chris J Arges
2008-05-13  8:40         ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-05-13  9:01           ` Vegard Nossum
2008-05-13  9:41           ` Gianni Tedesco
2008-05-13 10:25             ` Eric Dumazet
2008-05-13 10:59               ` Gianni Tedesco
     [not found]                 ` <482986B3.1090601@cosmosbay.com>
2008-05-13 14:38                   ` Gianni Tedesco
2008-05-13 15:23               ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-13 15:12             ` [PATCH] per_cpu: fix DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED for modules Eric Dumazet
2008-05-14  5:18               ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080513014010.e0723e01.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arges@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gxt@cs.nott.ac.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maynardj@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox