From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: arges@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Maynard Johnson <maynardj@us.ibm.com>,
Gianni Tedesco <gxt@cs.nott.ac.uk>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net, Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: oprofile BUG() in current kernel.
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 01:40:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080513014010.e0723e01.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1210610283.7218.4.camel@snuffleupagus>
On Mon, 12 May 2008 11:38:03 -0500 Chris J Arges <arges@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> This looks similar to:
> > >>
> > >> http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0805.0/2845.html
> > >>
> > >
> > > Yes, remarkably similar ;)
> > >
> > >
> > >> Does reverting 608dfddd845da5ab6accef70154c8910529699f7 fix it for you too?
> > >>
> > Has this fix been officially reverted?
>
> Let me know if this change is going to be reverted, as I have a patch
> ready to support cpu hotplug for oprofile based on code post
> DEFINE_PER_CPU patch.
Please don't top-post. I repaired it so that I could reply sensibly.
In trying to reprocude this on a uniprocessor machine, it seems that
someone broke oprofile:
/usr/bin/opcontrol: line 911: /dev/oprofile/0/enabled: No such file or directory
/usr/bin/opcontrol: line 911: /dev/oprofile/0/event: No such file or directory
/usr/bin/opcontrol: line 911: /dev/oprofile/0/count: No such file or directory
/usr/bin/opcontrol: line 911: /dev/oprofile/0/kernel: No such file or directory
/usr/bin/opcontrol: line 911: /dev/oprofile/0/user: No such file or directory
/usr/bin/opcontrol: line 911: /dev/oprofile/0/unit_mask: No such file or directo
sony:/home/akpm> l /dev/oprofile
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 May 13 01:25 1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 May 13 01:25 backtrace_depth
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 May 13 01:25 buffer
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 May 13 01:25 buffer_size
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 May 13 01:25 buffer_watershed
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 May 13 01:25 cpu_buffer_size
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 May 13 01:25 cpu_type
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 0 May 13 01:25 dump
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 May 13 01:25 enable
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 May 13 01:25 pointer_size
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 May 13 01:25 stats
Looks like the "0" got renamed to "1". Who did that?
So then I try it on the old 2-way:
No event named GLOBAL_POWER_EVENTS is available.
No event named GLOBAL_POWER_EVENTS is available.
No event named GLOBAL_POWER_EVENTS is available.
No event named GLOBAL_POWER_EVENTS is available.
No event named GLOBAL_POWER_EVENTS is available.
so that got broken too.
I queued the revert of 608dfddd845da5ab6accef70154c8910529699f7,
although that doesn't fix these regressions.
I see no oops. And I don't see what's wrong with the fairly simple
per-cpu conversion, so I'd rather not revert what appears to be a good
patch when we don't understand what's going wrong.
Grasping at straws, we have had problems with per-cpu variable
initialisation in the past. Does this
--- a/drivers/oprofile/cpu_buffer.c~a
+++ a/drivers/oprofile/cpu_buffer.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
#include "buffer_sync.h"
#include "oprof.h"
-DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct oprofile_cpu_buffer, cpu_buffer);
+DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct oprofile_cpu_buffer, cpu_buffer) = { };
static void wq_sync_buffer(struct work_struct *work);
_
fix anything for anyone?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-13 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-12 12:02 oprofile BUG() in current kernel Gianni Tedesco
2008-05-12 12:19 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-05-12 13:31 ` Gianni Tedesco
2008-05-12 14:11 ` Maynard Johnson
2008-05-12 16:38 ` Chris J Arges
2008-05-13 8:40 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-05-13 9:01 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-05-13 9:41 ` Gianni Tedesco
2008-05-13 10:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-05-13 10:59 ` Gianni Tedesco
[not found] ` <482986B3.1090601@cosmosbay.com>
2008-05-13 14:38 ` Gianni Tedesco
2008-05-13 15:23 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-13 15:12 ` [PATCH] per_cpu: fix DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED for modules Eric Dumazet
2008-05-14 5:18 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080513014010.e0723e01.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arges@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gxt@cs.nott.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maynardj@us.ibm.com \
--cc=oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox