public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de>
Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.25.3: su gets stuck for root
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 07:46:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080514054634.GA2645@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <482A70BC.3010607@t-online.de>

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 06:55:24AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >
> >even as root ? Because if you run strace on "su" as a user, you will
> >lose the setuid which may change the conditions.
> >
> 
> It gets stuck _only_ if I am root. Running su without root permission
> is no problem.

OK. That's quite strange.

> As written before, If I kick out the "stty intr '^C'" from root's
> .bashrc, then the second su succeeds. Running the stty command
> manually in this new shell is no problem.
> 
> Can you reproduce this problem? It doesn't need XWindow or any
> special user. Simply login as root on tty2, and run "su". If it
> gets stuck, then you could login on tty3 and kill -9 ### the blocking
> stty.

I tried (I'm on 2.6.25.1). But neither "su", "su willy" nor "stty intr ^C"
caused such a problem unfortunately.

You may want to ask several people to test in the same environment as
yours (same distro, etc...) in order to find whether it's a user-land
bug or a kernel bug. Most likely it's a kernel bug or side effect which
is triggered by your version of su or stty.

> Regards
> 
> Harri

Willy


  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-14  5:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-13  6:17 2.6.25.3: su gets stuck for root Harald Dunkel
2008-05-13  6:47 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-05-13 17:43   ` Harald Dunkel
2008-05-13 19:46     ` Willy Tarreau
2008-05-14  4:55       ` Harald Dunkel
2008-05-14  5:46         ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2008-05-14  7:34     ` Vegard Nossum
2008-05-14 17:05       ` Harald Dunkel
2008-05-14 17:17         ` Vegard Nossum
2008-05-14 17:35           ` Alan Cox
2008-05-18 17:56             ` Harald Dunkel
2008-05-18 17:51               ` Alan Cox
2008-05-20 19:01                 ` Harald Dunkel
2008-05-20 19:12                   ` david
2008-05-20 20:26                     ` Harald Dunkel
2008-05-20 20:38                       ` Willy Tarreau
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-02  1:31 Joe Peterson
2008-06-02  5:12 ` Harald Dunkel
2008-06-02  5:32   ` Willy Tarreau
2008-06-02  5:55     ` Joe Peterson
2008-06-02  8:10     ` Alan Cox
2008-06-02  9:01       ` David Newall
2008-06-02  9:20         ` Alan Cox
2008-06-02 10:16           ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-02 10:39             ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-02 10:52               ` Alan Cox
2008-06-02 10:57                 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-02 12:28                   ` Alan Cox
2008-06-02 14:31                     ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-02 10:50             ` Alan Cox
2008-06-17 15:32               ` Joe Peterson
2008-06-02 15:26           ` Joe Peterson
2008-06-02 15:51             ` Alan Cox
2008-06-02 16:03               ` Joe Peterson
2008-06-04 14:43               ` Joe Peterson
2008-06-04 15:16                 ` Alan Cox
2008-06-04 16:52                   ` Joe Peterson
2008-06-04 17:10                     ` Alan Cox
2008-06-04 20:32                       ` Joe Peterson
2008-06-11 14:04                         ` Joe Peterson
2008-06-12 11:52                           ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-14  1:49                             ` Joe Peterson
2008-06-14  7:45                               ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-14 17:43                                 ` Joe Peterson
2008-06-14 20:34                                   ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-14 20:52                                     ` Joe Peterson
2008-06-14 21:26                                       ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-14 21:34                                         ` Joe Peterson
2008-06-02  5:42   ` Joe Peterson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080514054634.GA2645@1wt.eu \
    --to=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=harald.dunkel@t-online.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox