From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762959AbYENSGt (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 14:06:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755230AbYENSGj (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 14:06:39 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:59871 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754435AbYENSGj (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 14:06:39 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 11:04:07 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Evgeniy Polyakov Cc: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [1/1] Export __lock_page_killable() Message-Id: <20080514110407.f8bad229.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080514143214.GA12700@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <20080514141157.GA27047@2ka.mipt.ru> <20080514151356.0cb4abfe@core> <20080514143214.GA12700@2ka.mipt.ru> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 14 May 2008 18:32:15 +0400 Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > Actually what I want to hear, is that it is needed or not at all... Yes, I think it's a reasonable thing to export. We could do it now as part of a "make the API complete" exercise but more typically we'd do it when merging code which needs that export.